Office of Management and Budget Click to print this document

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CIVIL WORKS

 
Since 2001, the Administration:
The President’s Budget
 

Army Corps of Engineers—Civil Works

John Paul Woodley, Jr., Assistant Secretary of the Army

www.hq.usace.army.mil/cepa/cepa.htm     703–697–8986

Number of Employees: 24,800

2005 Discretionary Budget Authority: $4.0 billion

Major Assets: The Corps builds, maintains, and/or operates 8,000 water projects across the Nation. Each year, it dredges 900 harbors, operates 275 locks and dams and 78 hydropower facilities, and manages 4,300 recreation areas.

Assistant Secretary of the Army Woodley (second from right) breaking ground at a priority project in the Florida Everglades.
A photo of Assistant Secretary of the Army Civil Works John Paul Woodley, Jr., breaking ground at a Corps project in Florida.

OVERVIEW

    The civil works program of the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) carries out three main missions: 1) reducing the damage caused by floods and storms; 2) facilitating commercial navigation; and 3) restoring aquatic ecosystems. In addition, Corps dams generate electric power and create lakes that provide recreation throughout the country. The Corps also regulates the development of roads, shopping centers and other construction affecting wetlands. The Corps carries out this work in partnership with State and local governments and other non-Federal entities, including port authorities and private contractors.

    The civil works responsibilities of the Corps date back to the 18th Century when the Nation had no other cadre of engineers to survey and build the dirt roads, and later the canals, needed to reach the Alleghenies and the lands beyond. Since then, the Corps has become the largest of the Federal water resources agencies. Most recently, the expertise developed through the civil works program has been called upon by the Nation to support reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Balancing the “Scales”: Fish Recovery and Hydropower in the Pacific Northwest
A photo of the Ice Harbor Dam on the Snake River.

The Budget funds projects with the highest economic and/or environmental benefits. For example, the President is committed to supporting salmon recovery efforts in the Pacific Northwest, while ensuring the availability of affordable hydroelectric power in the region.

Over the last three years, the Administration has provided $258 million for Columbia River Fish Recovery (WA, OR, ID), one of eight high-priority projects. The President’s Budget provides $107 million for this Corps construction project, which, together with other Administration-supported salmon recovery efforts, have yielded the following results:


    In the 20th Century, intensive water resources development—by the Corps and several other Federal water resources agencies—transformed the American landscape. By providing an easier way to transport goods to distant markets, building dams that generate inexpensive power, and facilitating the development of flood plains, Corps water projects affected where and how people live and influenced how our country developed. While these accomplishments greatly benefited the country, the projects often resulted in a significant loss of natural habitat.

    The country today seeks economic development as well as the protection of environmental values. The Corps is now demonstrating that it is possible to have both if we proceed responsibly. This has required the Corps to improve the quality of its project planning and priority setting. This Administration has emphasized the need to allocate limited Federal funds to projects with a high environmental or economic return and the importance of completing the most deserving projects more quickly to realize these benefits. In the 2004 Budget, the President presented a strategy for achieving his objectives. The 2005 Budget keeps the focus on maximizing the benefits of Corps investments. Funding is targeted to completing the best existing projects, and to a limited number of new projects whose benefits to the Nation greatly exceed their costs, such as an important series of pilot projects in the Everglades.

    A concerted effort by this Administration and the Congress is needed to ensure that the ongoing and future efforts of the Corps are environmentally sustainable, economically responsible, and fiscally sound. Achieving this goal will require a transformation in cultural attitudes. That needed change has begun both in how the Corps approaches its work, and in the way that the Congress authorizes and funds the projects of the civil works program. This Budget further advances these reforms.

IMPROVING PROGRAM PERFORMANCE

Chart showing the growth trend in the Corps construction backlog and how the President’s Budget reduces this backlog over time.

    The 2005 Budget focuses resources on two priorities. First, it focuses on completing the work we have already started and, in particular, it accelerates the construction of eight ongoing projects that, once completed, will provide an extremely high net environmental or economic return to the Nation. The second priority is to investigate and start a few new projects with potentially large net benefits compared to their costs.

    Reducing the Backlog. The Corps’ enormous backlog of ongoing civil works construction represents a significant source of unrealized economic and environmental benefits. The size of the backlog and the amount of funding necessary to complete it have grown in recent years, largely because of the continued addition of new projects to the Corps workload each year. Unfortunately, many of these new projects have benefits that only marginally exceed their costs.

    This growth trend in the construction backlog unfairly penalizes both taxpayers and project sponsors. The addition of new construction projects diverts resources from completing ongoing construction work, so that the benefits that the public reasonably expects to receive from Corps projects are often deferred many years. In order to restore the long-term viability of the Corps construction program, the Budget proposes to direct most of the available funds toward those ongoing projects that are either nearing completion or offer the highest returns (environmental or economic) to the Nation. Toward that end, the funds provided for construction work in 2005 will result in the completion of 11 projects and enable significant progress on eight high-priority, high-return projects. Once completed, these projects will significantly reduce flood and storm damage, augment the capability of major commercial harbors and waterways, restore the aquatic environment, and reduce the impacts of major water projects on endangered species.

    Supporting New Starts. In addition to placing a priority on finishing backlogged projects, this Budget proposes funding for a limited number of new starts. This approach reflects the Corps commitment to a construction program that is guided by the Principles for Improving Program Performance, which were announced in the 2004 Budget. These principles stress the importance of using objective criteria, such as benefit-cost analyses, to compare and rank projects across the Nation. Using these data, the Budget directs funding to projects that will provide the highest net environmental and economic return to the Nation.

Priority Projects 2005 Budget Authority
(in millions of dollars)
Project Purpose
New York/New Jersey Harbor (NY, NJ) 103 Commercial Navigation
Olmsted Locks and Dam, Ohio River (IL, KY) 75 Commercial Navigation
Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Recovery (IA, NE, KS, MO) 69 Commercial Navigation/Mitigation
Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (IL, IA, MN, MO, WI) 28 Commercial Navigation/Mitigation
Sims Bayou, Houston (TX) 16 Flood Damage Reduction
West Bank, New Orleans (LA) 37 Flood/Storm Damage Reduction
Columbia River Fish Recovery (OR, WA, ID) 107 Hydropower/Mitigation
Everglades (FL) 125 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration

    The 2005 Budget includes construction funding to start two new flood damage reduction projects and one new aquatic ecosystem restoration program. The two flood control projects are expected to return to the Nation three dollars in net benefits for every dollar spent. The Budget also proposes several new high-priority reconnaissance-level studies. The Corps’ new performance-based budgeting process, discussed in the next section, is instrumental in identifying such “high return” projects.

    Mitigating Project Impacts. The Corps is committed to limiting the adverse environmental impacts of its projects. Its concurrent and post-construction mitigation activities permit the Corps to offset damage to natural habitat, while minimizing the impact on commercial navigation, flood damage reduction and other water uses. For example, the Budget includes $28 million for the Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program to revitalize the side channels of the upper Mississippi, where habitat has been damaged by the construction and operation of a navigation channel.

    Responding to Change. The Corps is adapting its missions and processes to reflect advances in science, engineering and economics, changing public values and priorities, and new laws. This process has accelerated in recent years in response to a greater focus on efficiency and environmental challenges and opportunities. For example, the Corps has established five national centers of planning expertise and has begun using interagency groups to guide complex studies.

A Fiscally Responsible, Performance-Based Approach

    In developing its budget proposal for 2005, the Corps assessed the relative merits of each potential investment in each of its program areas. This approach represents an important step towards the President’s goal of making fiscally responsible funding decisions based more on results and less on factors such as “what did they get last year.” This is the essence of the Corps’ performance-based budget. The Administration funds activities that will yield the greatest net benefit to society per dollar invested, and evaluates them relative to the Corps’ three main mission areas:

A top bottom. The Budget provides $103 million to dredge and improve the Port of New York and New Jersey. This is one of eight top priority projects identified in the Budget. The estimated net benefits of the construction under way are two times greater than the costs.
A photo of New York/New Jersey Harbor, one of the President’s eight priority projects.

    Commercial Navigation. The Corps ranked its potential operation and maintenance and construction priorities based on existing performance measures. The 2005 Budget provides $1.1 billion to operate and maintain ports and inland waterways, and $528 million for construction at these sites. This includes $103 million to deepen the New York/New Jersey Harbor and $75 million for Olmsted Locks and Dam in Illinois and Kentucky. Both of these projects have been high priorities of the Administration, and since 2001, the Administration has proposed more than $421 million and $259 million in funding, respectively, to complete construction of these projects.

    Flood/Storm Damage Reduction. The Budget provides $450 million to continue progress on flood damage reduction projects, including projects in Sims Bayou, Texas, and West Bank, Louisiana. In addition, the Budget proposes two new flood damage reduction construction starts in Rio Guanajibo, Puerto Rico, and in Washington, D.C., whose estimated net benefits are 2.5 and 3.6 times greater, respectively, than their costs. As with the budget for commercial navigation, existing performance measures informed the Administration’s funding decisions in this program area. The 2005 Budget continues progress on the construction of beach nourishment projects that will reduce storm damages. The Budget funds the initial construction phase of these projects, while shifting to non-Federal sponsors the responsibility for financing follow-up re-nourishment work.

    Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration. The 2005 Budget provides $408 million for restoration work, including significant funding for the two projects discussed below.

More like it used to be. The President’s Budget accelerates portions of the Everglades restoration project.
A photo of a snowy egret standing beside the water in the Everglades.

A 1970 photo showing a navigation channel through Louisiana wetlands.

A 2001 photo showing the loss of wetlands surrounding the same navigation channel.

Less like it used to be. Portions of the Louisiana coast continue to slowly submerge into the Gulf due to both natural and manmade causes. The above photos show the same navigation channel in 1970 and 2001.


    This coordinated approach to restoration combines a commitment to address the highest priority needs with a search for innovative solutions. It also ensures that the coastal Louisiana restoration effort will, in the long-term, be able to adapt and evolve as needed, based on the best available science.

INITIATIVES THAT ENCOURAGE INNOVATION

Modernizing Recreation Facilities

    The Corps is one of the largest Federal providers of outdoor recreation services. It manages 4,300 recreation areas at 456 Corps projects in 43 States. The agency’s recreation program serves millions of people each year because many of its facilities are located near metropolitan areas. For example, Lake Lanier attracts large numbers of visitors from Atlanta, Georgia, as does J. Percy Priest Lake from Nashville, Tennessee.

A U.S. map showing the location of Corps facilities that provide recreation services.

    The Corps spends about $260 million each year to support this popular program. Intense competition for limited Federal funds, however, has left the Corps unable to adequately modernize its recreation facilities in many instances. Many of the Corps’ facilities were built 30 to 40 years ago and were designed to meet recreation needs of the public at that time.

    The 2005 Budget proposes a Corps recreation facility modernization initiative, based on a promising model now used by other major Federal recreation providers such as the National Park Service and the Forest Service. The Rec Mod initiative has three major components:

Nice Catch. More to come. The Administration is proposing a recreation modernization initiative that would improve the quantity and quality of services available at Corps recreation sites, such as this one, below J. Percy Priest Dam, near Nashville, Tennessee.
A photo of a fisherman holding up two large fish he has caught in the lake below J. Percy Priest Dam, a Corps project near Nashville, Tennessee.

Increasing Responsiveness by Establishing a Maintenance Reserve Fund

    The 2005 Budget provides $1.9 billion for the operation and maintenance of existing Corps projects, including funding to improve the security of Corps facilities.

Be prepared. In the past, emergency repairs have been funded by transferring money from the maintenance of other projects. The President’s Budget provides for a reserve fund, so that when the unexpected happens, the money is already available. This means planned maintenance, such as lock repairs shown at Smithland Locks and Dam in Kentucky, can proceed without interruption.
A picture of workers repairing a lock at the Smithland Locks and Dam in Kentucky.

    Within this amount, the Budget proposes to create a $35 million emergency maintenance reserve fund, from which the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works will make allocations to meet high-priority, unexpected and urgent maintenance needs at key Corps facilities. Under current practice, the Corps allocates appropriated funds to its 38 District offices, which in turn commit them to specific projects. When an unexpected emergency occurs, it is sometimes difficult to find the needed funds on a timely basis. Under the new arrangement, the Assistant Secretary for Civil Works will be able to respond to these emergency situations promptly, without interfering with other program commitments.

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SELECT PROGRAMS

    The Budget continues to focus on improving program performance. Six of the Corps' programs were assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART), which evaluated the programs' design and purpose, strategic planning efforts, how well they are managed, and whether they are generating positive results for taxpayers. Below are some of the highlights and recommendations from the PART evaluation conducted this year. For further details on the Corps’ performance assessments, see the White House budget website at www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/.

Program Rating Explanation Recommendation
Regulatory Program Moderately Effective The program gets mixed reviews. It adds somewhat to the costs and uncertainty that developers face, but it avoids gridlock and encourages environmentally responsible economic activity. It has performance standards but they need to be upgraded. It is not clear in all cases whether developers are meeting the terms of their permits and whether created wetlands meet quality standards. Corps program managers should increase program flexibility where appropriate. They should address wetland quality issues. They should implement improved performance targets as quickly as possible, for example, completing compliance verification inspections on 20 percent of all permits issued the prior year and issuing more than 70 percent of permits within 120 days after the agency receives the application.

    The PART analyses the Administration completed last year also helped shape this year’s Budget. The PART analysis of inland waterways, for example, concluded that the Corps should give priority to the operation and maintenance of high-use segments of inland waterways, and the 2005 Budget proposal is consistent with that assessment. The PART analysis of non-regulatory wetland activities concluded that the Corps should focus on identifying where and how the agency can best contribute to the overall national wetland effort. The Budget proposal developed in response to the loss of Louisiana coastal wetlands includes practical ways to follow up on that PART assessment.

UPDATE ON THE PRESIDENT’S MANAGEMENT AGENDA

    The table below provides an update on the Corps’ implementation of the President’s Management Agenda as of December 31, 2003.

  Human Capital Competitive Sourcing Financial Performance E-Government Budget and Performance Integration
Status Yellow Bullet Red Bullet Red Bullet Red Bullet Red Bullet
Progress Green Bullet Yellow Bullet Yellow Bullet Green Bullet Yellow Bullet
The Army Corps of Engineers has developed a sound, comprehensive human capital plan and has completed functional area assessments for the “Corps 2012” reorganization plan. The 2012 plan is the Corps guiding document for organizational changes and process changes to improve service delivery. The Corps continues to be a strong supporter of E-Gov initiatives such as Recreation One Stop, Geospatial, and Disaster Management. It is aggressively working to improve the overall management of its information technology investments by extensively using the Federal Enterprise Architecture to identify opportunities to consolidate like systems and identify possible opportunities to collaborate. The Corps has developed a plan and management infrastructure to conduct competitive sourcing and has completed all preliminary planning steps for its first two standard competitions to be announced in 2004. To address problems identified in its audits for 2002 and 2003, the Corps is improving documentation to support older assets.

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CIVIL WORKS
(In millions of dollars)

  Actual   Estimate
  2001 2003   2004 2005
Spending          
   Discretionary Budget Authority:          
      Construction 1,716 1,743   1,733 1,422
      Operation and Maintenance 1,984 1,928   1,956 1,926
      Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries 359 342   322 270
      Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies 50 77   -2 50
      General Investigations 161 134   116 90
      Regulatory Program 125 138   139 150
      Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program 140 144   139 140
      General Expenses 152 154   159 167
   Subtotal, Discretionary budget authority adjusted 4,687 4,660   4,562 4,215
      Legislative Proposal, Operation and Maintenance   -150
      Legislative Proposal, Cancellation of construction balances   -100
   Total, Discretionary budget authority 4,687 4,660   4,562 3,965
           
   Total, Discretionary outlays 4,723 4,850   4,289 4,132
           
   Mandatory Outlays:          
         Existing law 3 -134   15 64
         Legislative Proposal, Recreation Program User Fee Pilot   -7
   Total, Mandatory outlays 3 -134   15 57
           
   Total, Outlays 4,726 4,716   4,304 4,189

Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/corps.html

Click to print this document