Statement of The Honorable Linda M. Springer
Controller, Office of Federal Financial Management
Office of Management and Budget
Subcommittee on Government Efficiency and Financial Management
Committee on Government Reform
United States House of Representatives
April 15, 2004
The Improper Payments Information
Act of 2002
and the Efficient Use of Taxpayer Dollars
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I appreciate the opportunity to testify before this Subcommittee again on
the subject of the propriety of government payments. I am also pleased to
be spending the afternoon in York, Pennsylvania, which is close to my familys
home in Lancaster County.
Let me first say that eliminating improper payments by the Federal Government
has been, and continues to be, a major management focus of this Administration.
We strongly feel that one of the most important requirements in executing
our missions is responsible spending and the efficient stewardship of taxpayer
It is the goal of this Administration to ensure that every dollar spent
by the Federal Government is a dollar that is spent wisely and for the purpose
for which it is intended. No payment made by the government should be wasted
or spent in an improper or erroneous fashion. Given the Federal Governments
current budget in excess of $2 trillion annually and the many important
competing priorities and programs, our mission is more important now than
Since the Presidents Management Agenda (PMA) was first announced
in 2001, the elimination of improper payments has been a key component of
the Improving Financial Performance initiative. As part of this initiative,
we have been working very hard with Federal agencies to identify and eliminate
improper payments within major programs and activities.
Specifically, it is our job at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
to make certain that government agencies review their payments and assess
whether a risk of improper payment exists. If such a risk does exist, then
corrective action must be taken to ensure that the improper payment does
not occur again. We anticipate that ongoing agency efforts will ultimately
lead to a review of every single dollar that the government spends to ensure
that taxpayer money is spent for the purpose for which it was intended.
Initially, the effort to eliminate improper payments focused on Federal
programs making annual payments in excess of $2 billion. Included were 40
programs, found within 15 different agencies, such as the Earned Income
Tax Credit (EITC), Highway Planning and Construction, Medicare, Medicaid
and TANF. Those programs were first required to assess the risk of, and
estimate the extent of, their improper payments, and then to implement a
strategy to eliminate them. The agencies were directed to follow the necessary
requirements set out in Section 57 of OMB Circular A-11 and report on the
programs in their annual budget submissions.
Collectively, the Section 57 programs comprised about $1 trillion in government
spending nearly half of all annual government expenditures. We estimate
that improper payments exceed $35 billion a year out of the $1 trillion
in spending by these programs. Needless to say, this is an enormous amount
of money being spent in an improper fashion, and we have a duty to the American
taxpayers to eliminate such improper payments.
Our goal to eliminate improper payments as first envisioned in the PMA was
later endorsed by the Improper Payments Information Act (IPIA
or the Act) enacted by Congress in 2002. The IPIA extended
the scope of review from Section 57 programs to all major agency programs
and activities. It is the Administrations belief that the provisions
of the Act, combined with the Section 57 reviews that were already underway,
will help to ensure that all Federal dollars are spent only for the purpose
for which they were intended.
Following the enactment of the IPIA, in May of 2003 the Administration provided
guidance (OMB Memorandum M-03-13) for agencies to comply with the Act. This
guidance outlined six steps that each agency must follow to properly identify
and eliminate improper payments. These particular steps are as follows:
The Administration is actively working with the major
agencies to ensure that each is complying with the IPIA and working toward
completion of the six steps set out in the Administrations guidance.
In the fall of 2003, I personally met with the Offices
of the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the Inspector General (IG) of
each major agency to ensure that plans to meet the requirements of the
Act were being developed. Following these meetings, we directed all agencies
to submit by November 30, 2003, their plan for complying with the Act.
All of the agencies met this goal. After our review of the plans, in January
of 2004 we responded in writing to all agency CFOs with specific comments
and questions about their proposals.
Subsequent to this correspondence, we held another series
of meetings with the CFO offices of the major agencies this past February
and March. At these meetings, we finalized the agency plans to comply
with the IPIA and directed the agencies to set specific target dates for
completing the required steps to ensure that results are achieved on a
timely basis. We now have specific dates in which the key milestones are
expected to be completed, and we will track each agencys progress
in meeting these deadlines over the course of the coming months.
At this point, most agencies have completed the compilation
of their program inventories. Over the course of this year, most agencies
are expected to complete the remaining steps on the following schedule:
risk assessments by the end of May; statistical sampling by the end of
June; and corrective action plans, baseline and improvement targets by
the end of September. All agencies are then required to report their activities
relating to the elimination of improper payments in their 2004 PARs, which
are to be issued on November 15, 2004. During these next seven months
and beyond, we will be working with the agencies to make certain that
progress is made, target dates are met, milestones are completed, and
results are achieved.
Following the most recent meetings with the agency CFO
offices, we are confident that, while progress is being made, significant
challenges remain. Most notably, we are working with the agencies to develop
cost-effective approaches for tracking improper payments at each stage
of the payment lifecycle. In other words, we want to follow the dollar
from the Federal agency through any intermediary and ultimately to the
individual recipient. The more complex the program, the more challenging
it is to track these payments and thus establish an annual national error
rate. Even for the most complex programs, however, we are developing solutions
that will enable us to implement appropriate financial management improvements
and obtain the information necessary to gauge results on an annual basis.
The earlier described planning, risk assessing, and sampling
processes are all tools and necessary steps to achieving the real purpose
of our efforts the elimination of improper payments. It remains
the goal of this Administration to ensure that each taxpayer dollar is
spent wisely, efficiently, and for the purpose for which it was originally
intended. We are committed to this endeavor until our objective has been
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am happy to entertain your
Compile an inventory of all payments/outlays.
Identify all payment streams in every program.
Conduct risk assessments.
Identify those programs the agency believes have an error rate
of at least 2.5% and an error amount in excess of $10 million.
Conduct statistical analyses.
Take a sample of payments in those programs identified in Step
Track those payments through an audit/verification process to
Use information found in the sample to extrapolate an error
rate and amount for the program as a whole.
Develop corrective action plans.
For those programs in Step 3 above that are found to have in
excess of $10 million in improper payments, develop a plan for eliminating
Develop a baseline and improvement targets.
For programs that have corrective action plans, agencies must
establish reduction targets for future years.
Report results annually in the Performance and Accountability Report
PARs are to be submitted by November 15 each year.