From: <>
Sent 4/9/2009 5:53:37 PM
Subject: Material on Open Government

As suggested by Beth Noveck, to whom I sent a copy this morning, the following is offered for consideration.  Permission is granted to share this material publicly.

Reproduced below is the index to the latest issue of Standards Today, which focuses on technology and open government. Unlike most of the debate, which focuses on what should be disclosed and
made interactive, the articles in this issue focus on how critical decisions relating to the choice of technology and standards will determine who will be able to take advantage of open government.  If the wrong decisions are made, open  government will be open only to the technically sophisticated, the able-bodied and the well to do, rather than to all.

I've pasted in the email announcement below, but in case the links are no longer live, you can find the complete issue here:

Finally, you'll note in the Editor's Note at the beginning that there are several previous issues that focus on other technology aspects of the Obama agenda:

Best regards,

Andrew Updegrove
Gesmer Updegrove LLP
40 Broad Street
Boston, Massachusetts  02109
T:  617/350-6800
F:  617/350-6878

Standards Today
A Journal of News, Ideas and Analysis logo
Gesmer Updegrove LLP logo

February - March 2009

Vol VIII No 2
IT Policy And The Road To Open Government

With Access and Information for All

Over the last two hundred years, poll taxes, literacy tests and other artificial barriers have too often stood between the less privileged and the exercise of their rights of citizenship. Will the migration of government services to the Web be a great leap forward, or an avoidably negligent step back?

Enabling Open Government

The Obama Administration has committed to creating an "unprecedented level of openness in government," made possible by an equally ambitious utilization of information technology. How that technology, and the standards upon which it relies, are selected will determine whether open government is made available to all, or only to the technically sophisticated, the able-bodied, and the well to do.

How Open Must Open Government Platforms be?

Governments represent some of the most complex enterprises in existence, typically comprising multiple "silos" of high-value information trapped within proprietary legacy systems. Government CIOs today are struggling to upgrade their vast IT systems to exchange information across the enterprise, even as President Obama has called upon them to make much of the same information publicly accessible via the Internet. What should the result look like, and why?

"Openness," the Customer and the IDABC

"Openness" in technology means different things to different people in different settings, because different settings attract different participants with different goals. What should it mean to governments?

Killing the Cockroach: The Incredibly Illogical, Fundamentally Odious - but Seemingly Ineradicable- Billable Hour

You'd never write a blank check to a house painter to paint your house. So why hand one to a lawyer? Good question.



Please reply to this e-mail with the word REMOVE in the subject line.


This email may constitute "advertising" or "solicitation" under applicable laws (including the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 and rules regulating attorney conduct). This email does not constitute the rendering of legal advice by Gesmer Updegrove LLP or its attorneys.


The Consortium Standards Bulletin is a source of news, ideas and analysis relevant to those that develop and use standards. For the latest standards news, updated on a daily basis, use the RSS feed at, or bookmark:

For more information about, click is sponsored by Gesmer Updegrove LLP. Please access the GU Web site at to learn about the firm's consortium and standards practice.


Please register at:, or send an email to: with the word REGISTER in the subject line.

Gesmer Updegrove LLP
40 Broad Street
Boston, MA 02109
ph: 617-350-6800
fax: 617-350-6878

Copyright 2009 Andrew Updegrove. All rights reserved.

Any tax information or written tax advice contained herein (including any attachments) is not intended to be and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)

Electronic mail from Gesmer Updegrove LLP, 40 Broad Street, Boston, MA 02109. Voice: (617) 350-6800, Fax: (617) 350-6878. This communication is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named as the addressee. It may contain information which is privileged and/or confidential under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or such recipient's employee or agent, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify Christopher O'Sullivan at (617) 350-6800 and notify the sender by electronic mail. Please expunge this communication without making any copies. Thank you for your cooperation.