Council of Economic Advisers Blog
- Posted byon February 26, 2010 at 3:08 PM EDT
As President Obama made clear at the bipartisan meeting on health insurance reform, and has emphasized all year, small businesses stand to gain substantially from his proposal for comprehensive health insurance reform.
Small businesses are essential to the nation’s economy and its recovery from the recession. They are responsible for a disproportionate share of economy-wide net employment growth, and account for a large majority of jobs in start-ups, a key source of innovation and economic growth.
Nevertheless, both a CEA report released last year and new analysis by the Council of Economic Advisers shows that the status quo of rising costs and declining coverage is unsustainable for small businesses. Over the past decade, average annual family premiums for workers at small firms increased by 123 percent, from $5,700 in 1999 to $12,700 in 2009, while the percentage of small firms offering coverage fell from 65 percent to 59 percent. As shown in the following figure, this insurance offer rate is especially low at small firms with fewer than 10, 25, or 50 employees.
While opponents of reform have raised concerns that some of the provisions in the President’s proposal will harm small businesses and their employees, the facts, figures, and discussion below show that the proposal will mean tax cuts, no new requirements, and numerous other benefits for small firms and their employees:
The President’s proposal makes more than 60 percent of small firms eligible for tax credits to help combat rising costs and declining coverage for their workers.
- CEA estimates indicate that more than 60 percent of small employers would be eligible for the new $40 billion small business tax credit in the President’s proposal. This represents a total of nearly 4 million small firms eligible for the credit. Moreover, millions of workers at small firms and their families would be eligible for their own tax credits to purchase coverage through the Exchange if their firms did not offer coverage.
The President’s proposal exempts virtually all small businesses from any employer responsibility requirements.
- The proposal specifically exempts all firms that have fewer than 50 employees – 96 percent of all firms in the United States or 5.78 million out of 6.02 million total firms – from any employer responsibility requirements. These 5.78 million firms employ 33.8 million workers.
- More than 96 percent of firms with 50 or more employees already offer health insurance to their workers. Thus under the President’s proposal, less than 0.2 percent of all firms in the U.S. (approximately 10,000 out of 6.02 million) would face new employer responsibility requirements. And many of the firms not currently offering coverage are likely to do so because of the lower premiums and greater set of plan choices in the Exchange.
Pooling together with other small firms and individuals through a competitive Exchange will reduce costs, increase plan choice, and provide pressure on insurers to reduce their markups.
- Because individuals and small businesses are not currently pooled together into larger health insurance groups, the administrative costs of marketing and operating health plans are up to 26 percent higher as a percentage of claims compared with larger firms, leading to higher premiums.
- A report by the Congressional Budget Office (pdf) confirms that the Exchange will reduce costs and increase competitive pressure on insurers, driving down premiums for a given amount of coverage for a given group of enrollees by 1 to 4 percent in the small group market.
The President’s proposal will reduce “job lock,” and spur entrepreneurship, job growth, and productivity at small firms.
- As described in a recent CEA report, health insurance reform will reduce “job lock” – the fear of switching jobs or starting a small business due to concerns over losing health coverage – by guaranteeing access to coverage for all Americans. This will encourage more people to launch their own small businesses.
- Moreover, reform will make small firms more competitive by allowing them to offer coverage comparable to that of larger firms, letting them recruit and retain talented workers.
- Finally, improvements in access to coverage will lead to better health status and reduced disability, increasing workplace productivity.
Health insurance reform will benefit workers, firms, and the government budget in many more ways. For a discussion of these impacts, please read the CEA’s report on the Economic Case for Health Care Reform. Chapter 7 of the Economic Report of the President (pdf) also provides a comprehensive discussion of the challenges in the current health care system and the way that reform components work together to address these problems.
Christina Romer is Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers and Mark Duggan is a Senior Economist at the Council of Economic Advisers who focuses on Health
- Posted byon February 19, 2010 at 11:26 AM EDT
One of the challenges in evaluating the impact of fiscal stimulus is to figure out what would have happened had there been no stimulus. Earlier, this blog discussed evidence that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is having a positive impact on the U.S. economy. More evidence can be found in the Second Quarterly Report of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and independent evaluations have been highlighted in the media like in this analysis from the New York Times.
Another type of evidence can come from looking at the impact of stimulus across countries. This economic crisis has been a world-wide crisis and the government of nearly every major economy engaged in discretionary fiscal stimulus to try to rekindle demand. As shown in Chapter 3 of the Economic Report of the President, real GDP growth performance varied with the amount of stimulus. One cannot simply look at growth and stimulus alone, because the economic crisis differed in depth across countries and because different countries have different typical growth rates. Thus, to understand the impact of fiscal stimulus, one must estimate what would have happened had there been no stimulus—a counterfactual. Private sector expectations in November 2008—after the crisis had begun but before most stimulus packages were adopted—can serve as that counterfactual. The evidence in the figure below shows that countries with larger fiscal stimulus on average exceeded expectations to a greater degree than those with smaller stimulus packages.
This picture attempts to control for all other effects (other policies, size of shock, automatic stabilizers) by using expectations. If fiscal stimulus is larger in countries that faced an unexpectedly large negative shock, this procedure would be an underestimate of the impact of stimulus. If fiscal stimulus is correlated with unanticipated monetary stimulus, it could overestimate the role of fiscal stimulus. But, this is an attempt to control for “what would have happened” based on what the market expected. Using OECD forecasts or a time series forecast gives similar results. See more details in the Economic Report of the President and in our report The Effects of Fiscal Stimulus: A Cross-Country Perspective.
Quarterly growth rates can exhibit some volatility and can be very hard to predict many months out, but looking at cumulative growth from the second quarter to the end of the year against forecasts for that period shows a very similar picture (though GDP data for the fourth quarter is still not available for many countries). High stimulus countries outperformed expectations. Fiscal stimulus helped restart the world economy.
Jay Shambaugh is a Senior Economist at the Council of Economic Advisers who focuses on International Macroeconomics and Trade
- Posted byon February 17, 2010 at 1:42 PM EDT
Today is the first anniversary of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The Recovery Act is the biggest, boldest, anti-recession fiscal policy action in American history. After a year, its impact on the economy is apparent. As discussed in Chapter 2 of the Economic Report of the President, the trajectory of the economy has changed dramatically, thanks in large part to the Recovery Act. The CEA estimates that the Act has raised employment relative to what it otherwise would have been by between 1½ and 2 million as of the fourth quarter of 2009.
It has also played a key role in turning GDP from falling to rising again. These estimates and conclusions are echoed by private sector analysts across the ideological spectrum and by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
The Recovery Act provided a tax cut to 95% of working families, helped state and local governments keep teachers and first responders on the job, cushioned the fall in income for unemployed workers, and made pioneering investments in the future of our economy. For details about the impact of the Recovery Act, please read the CEA’s Second Quarterly Report. This report not only discusses the overall economic impact of the Act, it highlights one area of particular investment – clean energy. By investing more than $90 billion in energy efficiency, clean energy manufacturing, renewable electricity generation, grid modernization, R&D, and other clean energy programs, the Recovery Act is helping to jump-start the transition to the clean energy economy.”
Christina Romer is the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers
- Posted byon February 11, 2010 at 10:00 AM EDT
Today, we are releasing the Economic Report of the President for 2010. For more than sixty years, the Economic Report has provided a nearly contemporaneous record of how Administrations have interpreted economic developments, the motivation for policy actions, and the results of those interventions. This year’s volume has attempted to stay true to this proud legacy. It provides a detailed economic history of the first year of the Obama Administration. It examines the economic challenges that we face as a Nation, the many policy actions that have already been taken to address these challenges, and the President’s proposals for further action.
The economic challenges facing the Nation when President Obama took office were among the greatest in our history. Last January, the American economy was truly in freefall. Real GDP was falling at an annual rate of more than 6 percent and the U.S. economy was losing jobs at the devastating rate of almost 800,000 per month. Our financial markets, having narrowly avoided collapse in the financial panic of the early fall of 2008, were paralyzed with fear, and borrowers of all sorts, from households to small businesses to large corporations, were having trouble accessing the credit necessary for normal economic activity. As a scholar of the 1930s, I can say that the threat of a second Great Depression was both genuine and terrifying.
But as great as the immediate challenges were, our country’s economic problems were also deeper and more long-standing. For nearly a decade, typical American families had seen their incomes stagnate, instead of rising steadily as they had for generations. Much of the economic growth that the United States experienced in the past decade was fueled by consumers and the government running up large debts, aided by a financial system better at making short-term profits than managing long-term risks. Rapidly rising health care costs were squeezing both family incomes and the government’s budget. And as a country, we were failing to invest as we needed to in education, new energy technologies, and basic research and development.
Over the past year, the President, working with Congress, has sought to rescue the economy from the immediate crisis, rebalance the economy toward greater investment and exports and away from unsustainable budget deficits, and begin the process of rebuilding the economy on a stronger foundation of quality, affordable health care, better education and job training, clean energy, and innovation. The Economic Report of the President details both the actions we have taken so far and the President’s plans for continued progress.
While it is impossible to describe the whole volume in detail, let me highlight the findings from three chapters and discuss how the other chapters fit into the Report.
Rescuing an Economy in Freefall
The Employment Act of 1946, which created both the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) and the Joint Economic Committee, made explicit that it was the role of the Federal Government “to promote maximum employment, production, and purchasing power.” Chapter 2 of the Economic Report discusses the unprecedented actions that have been taken to end the Great Recession of 2008 and 2009. It is no surprise that this chapter is the longest in the book; the actions that have been taken are many. They include not only the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, but a number of smaller fiscal actions such as the “cash for clunkers” program to stimulate the automobile industry and important extensions of key tax cuts and unemployment benefits. They include a range of financial sector interventions, such as the stress test of the nineteen largest financial institutions, new lending programs, and support for the government sponsored enterprises. Rescue actions also include programs to stabilize the housing market and help responsible homeowners avoid foreclosure, as well as conventional and extraordinary monetary policy measures conducted by the Federal Reserve.
Chapter 2 also discusses the evidence that these actions have had a tremendous impact. Our financial markets are secure again and credit spreads, a common measure of financial market unease, are down almost to historical norms. Despite overwhelming downward momentum, the trajectory of the economy has changed radically. By the third quarter of 2009, real GDP was growing again, and last Friday we learned that the unemployment rate fell three-tenths of a percentage point in January. Experts across the ideological spectrum credit the unprecedented policy actions with preventing an economic cataclysm and putting us on the road to recovery.
Here I want to discuss particularly the impact of the Recovery Act. This Act is the great unsung hero of the past year. It has provided a tax cut to 95 percent of America’s working families and thousands of small businesses. It has meant the difference between hanging on and destitution for millions of unemployed workers who had exhausted their conventional unemployment insurance benefits. It has kept hundreds of thousands of teachers, police, and firefighters employed by helping to fill the yawning hole in state and local budgets. And, it has made crucial long-run investments in our country’s infrastructure and jump-started the transition to the clean energy economy. All told, the Recovery Act has saved or created some 1½ to 2 million jobs so far, and is on track to have raised employment relative to what it otherwise would have been by 3.5 million by the end of this year. When the political rancor of the moment passes and dispassionate analysis is done by experts, I have no doubt that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 will be viewed as one of the great triumphs of timely, effective, countercyclical macroeconomic policy—just exactly the type of policy the Employment Act of 1946 was designed to facilitate.
While conditions are far better than they would have been without the actions that were taken, it is clear that substantial challenges remain. The unemployment rate is 9.7 percent and the revised data show that employment has fallen 8.4 million from its peak in December 2007. For this reason, the President has called for important targeted actions to spur job creation. One of these is the Small Business Jobs and Wages Tax Cut. The Council’s analysis suggests that such a tax cut for hiring could be a particularly cost-effective way to generate substantial increases in employment at this point in the recovery. The Administration also supports continuation of essential relief measures to aid the unemployed and to keep teachers, police, and first responders employed by strapped state and local governments.
In another chapter on rescue measures, the Economic Report discusses the worldwide response to the crisis. It shows that a coordinated move to monetary and fiscal expansion allowed countries around the globe to climb out of the crisis simultaneously. In this way, worldwide growth helped to support the growth in each individual country.
Rebalancing the Economy on the Path to Full Employment
In his State of the Union address, the President highlighted the problem of the Federal budget deficit. As described in Chapter 5 of the Economic Report, the Federal budget situation had deteriorated substantially before the recession. Largely because of two tax cuts, two wars, and a major new Medicare drug benefit that were not paid for, the budget surpluses of the 1990s had been replaced by substantial actual and projected future deficits long before the recession began at the end of 2007. The recession obviously made the deficit larger, as did the actions to address the recession, such as the Recovery Act. But by the end of the decade, the rescue actions raise the deficit by just one-quarter of one percent of GDP. The much more significant factors in accounting for the long-run deficit are the unpaid-for policies of the past decade and Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security costs. Whatever their cause, the medium- and long-run deficits that are projected are unsustainable, and will gradually crowd out investment and impede growth if they are not addressed.
Chapter 5 explains the logic of the Administration’s proposed fiscal target. By balancing the primary deficit (that is, the deficit net of interest costs) in the medium run, we will stabilize the debt-to-GDP ratio. To achieve this, the Administration has proposed a sensible plan that includes a three-year freeze of nonsecurity discretionary spending and a bipartisan commission to build consensus on other needed actions. At the same time, our budget contains $100 billion for further targeted jobs measures and additional funds for continuing relief efforts. Such a blending of near-term emergency spending and a medium- and long-term plan for fiscal sustainability is the sensible policy for this point in the recovery.
Other chapters of the Economic Report build on the theme of restoring balance to the American economy. CEA analysis suggests that American families are likely to be saving more in the future than they did in the past decade. To fill the gap left in demand, business investment and net exports will need to rise. The Administration has proposed a number of policies to encourage this healthy transition. Likewise, our financial regulatory system needs to be revamped to match 21st century financial innovation. We need to put in place sensible rules of the road to ensure that we do not return to the bubble and bust economy that has wreaked such havoc on the American economy in the past decade.
Rebuilding a Stronger Economy
In no area are the long-run challenges facing the American economy greater than in health care. We are all too aware of the statistics on the millions of Americans without health insurance. But, as we discuss in Chapter 7 of the Economic Report, the troubles are broader than that. American families with insurance face further stagnation and eventual decline in take-home wages as rising health insurance costs consume a larger and larger fraction of total compensation. Federal, State, and local governments face unsustainable pressure on their budgets as government health expenditures rise along with overall health care costs. That is why the President has made health insurance reform a top priority.
Working with Congress, we have already achieved a great deal. The extension of the Children’s Health Insurance Program will bring coverage to as many as 4 million more children. The Recovery Act provided support for unemployed workers to help them maintain health insurance benefits and made pioneering investments in health information technology, health centers, and research into which treatments are likely to work best. Both houses of Congress have passed reform legislation that would do so much more to slow the growth rate of health care costs, and make insurance coverage more secure for those who have it and affordable for the millions of Americans who do not. Successful completion of reform legislation is essential to our long-run economic prosperity, taming our government budget deficit, and making American families more secure in their health insurance coverage.
Three other chapters of the Economic Report discuss additional areas where the President believes we need to rebuild our economy stronger than before. Education is a key ingredient to improved productivity and wages. Clean energy holds the promise of generating good jobs at the same time that we reduce harmful greenhouse gas emissions. And innovation is the ultimate engine of economic growth. In each of these areas, the President and Congress have already made key substantive investments. But, as these chapters describe, there is much more that can and should be done to ensure a brighter future for our children and our country.
As I have described, this year’s Economic Report of the President is a blend of history, analysis, and prescription. It describes what we have been through during the past very difficult year. It describes the many actions we have taken to address both the near-term crisis and our longer-run problems. And, it contains an important agenda of policy actions that will help to ensure that the American economy not only recovers completely, but comes back even stronger than before.
Before I close, I want to acknowledge the outstanding staff of the Council of Economic Advisers who contributed to this report. The CEA is unique among government agencies in that most of the staff turns over every year. Our senior economists are typically professors on leave from universities, and our junior staff are typically students on leave from Ph.D. studies in economics or undergraduate economics majors. This past year, the Council has been blessed with staff of a caliber not seen since the glory days of the CEA in the 1960s, when future Nobel laureates Robert Solow and Kenneth Arrow were senior economists and James Tobin was a member. Leading experts in every field of economics joined the CEA staff this year to try to bring the best professional expertise to the tremendous economic challenges facing the country. The junior staff is equally gifted and has worked eighty hours a week with a cheerfulness and enthusiasm that is truly inspiring. I am indebted to all them, and to the dedicated permanent staff, and this volume reflects their collective wisdom and months of very hard work.
Christina Romer is Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers
- Posted byon January 29, 2010 at 10:30 AM EDT
Today’s GDP report is the most positive news to date on the economy. The data show that the total output of the U.S. economy increased strongly in the fourth quarter of 2009. Real GDP (that is, GDP adjusted for inflation) increased at an annual rate of 5.7 percent. The change from the first quarter of 2009, when GDP fell at an annual rate of 6.4 percent, is truly extraordinary; indeed, the three-quarter swing in growth rates was the largest since 1981.
While positive GDP growth is a necessary first step for job growth, our focus must remain on getting Americans back to work. That GDP rose strongly in the fourth quarter of last year while employment fell and the workweek increased only slightly emphasizes the need for policy actions designed to help spur private sector job creation. The President is announcing today the specifics of his plan for a small business jobs and wages tax cut. This policy is designed to encourage businesses to respond to rising demand and output by taking the plunge and hiring new workers again.
Part of the rapid growth in real GDP was due to a substantial rise in inventory investment. This inventory bounce, though likely to be transitory, is a normal part of healthy recoveries. As firms’ confidence in the future increases, their desire to run down inventories wanes. This change in behavior is often a powerful force for growth early in a recovery. Other components of GDP also rose strongly: business investment in equipment and software rose at an annual rate of 13 percent and residential investment rose at a 6 percent rate. And consumer spending rose at a rate of 2 percent. This broad-based rise in GDP was surely fueled in part by the tax cuts and investment spending in the Recovery Act and other rescue actions, but some appears to be the result of private sector demand returning.
As always, it is important not to read too much into a single report, positive or negative. There will surely be bumps in the road ahead, and we will need to continue to take responsible actions to ensure that the recovery is as smooth and robust as possible. Nonetheless, today’s report is a welcome piece of encouraging news.
Christina Romer is Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers
- Posted byon January 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM EDT
The past year has been one of enormous challenges for the American economy. President Obama took office at a time of economic crisis. The economy was losing jobs at a rate of close to 700,000 jobs a month, credit markets were functioning poorly, and real GDP was falling at a breakneck pace. The economy was at the edge of a cliff, and the possibility of a second Great Depression was frighteningly real.
Thus, the first task of the new administration had to be to be to turn around an economy in freefall. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which the President signed less than a month after taking office, was the boldest countercyclical fiscal action in American history. Together with Administration's Financial Stability Plan, its actions to aid distressed homeowners, and actions by the Federal Reserve and other regulators, the Recovery Act is generating one of the sharpest economic turnarounds since World War II. Real GDP, after falling at an increasingly rapid rate for three quarters, barely fell in the second quarter of 2009 and rose in the third quarter; and, it is widely expected that when the fourth quarter data are released later this month, they will show even larger growth. Job loss, which averaged 691,000 jobs a month is the first quarter of 2009, averaged 69,000 in the fourth quarter—one-tenth as much. A new CEA report released Wednesday found that the Recovery Act has been instrumental to this change in trajectory, and that approximately 2 million people are employed who otherwise would not be, because of the Act.
With the economy still losing jobs and unemployment at 10 percent, the economy is obviously far from healthy, and we have a long way still to go. That is why the Administration is committed to taking every responsible measure to spur job creation—measures ranging from the "Cash for Clunkers" program last summer, to the extensions of unemployment insurance and additional business tax cuts in the bill the President signed in November, to ideas explored at the Jobs Forum in December.
But, the Administration always knew that stabilizing the economy would not be enough. The problems that led to the crisis were years in the making, and even before the crisis, we faced significant long-run challenges. That is why even as the Administration has worked to rescue the economy form the recession, it was also working to build a new foundation for stronger, more balanced growth. One key part of these efforts is financial regulatory reform that will protect the economy from actions that could threaten financial and economic stability, and protect ordinary Americans in their dealings with sophisticated and powerful financial institutions. Another key step is health care reform—reform that will not only make insurance more secure for those with insurance and expand coverage to those without it, but also slow the growth rate of costs while maintaining quality, and so benefit households, businesses, and governments at every level. The Administration is also working to improve our education system, to promote the transition to a clean energy economy, and to foster faster productivity growth through greater innovation. We will continue these efforts in the new year.
It has been a critical year for economic policymaking and we have made significant progress. Despite this progress, there is much left to do. The President knows that the recession will not be truly over until the labor market has recovered. That is why he and his economic team are committed to bringing about strong employment growth and building an economy that is stronger and more secure for years to come.
Christina Romer is Chair of the Council of Eocnomic Advisers
White House Blogs
- The White House Blog
- Middle Class Task Force
- Council of Economic Advisers
- Council on Environmental Quality
- Council on Women and Girls
- Office of Intergovernmental Affairs
- Office of Management and Budget
- Office of Public Engagement
- Office of Science & Tech Policy
- Office of Urban Affairs
- Open Government
- Faith and Neighborhood Partnerships
- Social Innovation and Civic Participation
- US Trade Representative
- Office National Drug Control Policy